Marino Mayor Adriano Palozzi loses his temper whenever you are critical of his work. He's sorry that there are still some who do not has passed in the majority, there is still someone who can prove that the king is naked. That is not all gold that would like to sparkle.
I insert in the controversy between the director Julie Iozzo, a member of a civic list of which he was a candidate for mayor in 2006, Mayor Marino able to stick and carrot. Many carrots, sticks as well. It is clear that mine is not a defense motion Councillor Julie Iozzo, who knows defend itself.
First I was shocked by the disproportionate reaction Palozzi statements contained after all a city councilor in opposition.
Then I want to re-establish a principle: that of truth and verisimilitude, which is accustomed to our first citizen.
I also want to reaffirm the right of criticism, which is totally unknown to our infallible Palozzi. In summary, the critical
Iozzi the mayor in an interview with Time, 16 June, where the contest is mainly two things: disaster planning that is under everyone's eyes and a bad political relationship with the minority. Much more than "sketches of poison," as Palozzi barks. The Iozzi should reproach that has been made happy and songs, when more than a year ago and proposed that it be voted favorably on a city council committee of the joint study between majority and minority to deal with urban issues. Commission, which has remained a dead letter. She should remind him that many times in the City Council was requested by Iozzo and myself a list of documents must, deposited in the technical office of the City, containing areas granted to the public in decades to be trampled by the manufacturers at the expense citizens. For thrice was asked and was denied. And today we learn that one of these acts is precisely the obligation of the person of the mayor.
what about the alleged collaboration he generously offered to the opposition, the policy of the outstretched hand of "good volume status" for the good of the country? If someone at the beginning believed in good faith in its sincerity, can now fairly claim that he was ill of his repeated falsehood. Yet according to our leaders at least you do not even have the right to say it. It is true that
Palozzi launched its offer of cooperation in the municipal council, particularly every time you are in difficulty over issues "heavy", but then is how the hell they want. And if this is a correct relationship with the minority councilors, tell you readers and voters! The mayor if he can buy who does not know, according to a well-known proverb.
addition to this song collaboration, for some 'time the mayor has been saying another refrain: what is not its the fault of the disaster planning, which is leading our region and our city centers. If the plan did not like to have adopted a variant of protection, he could and could still adopt implementation plans, could avoid presenting special variants such as Bricocolo valley, could reject the "fake" territorial pacts (as I did) instead that the Board approves a majority of shots and then was forced to withdraw the next time, because exaggerated. Rather than asking the manufacturers, which have argued, to leave something to nationals! The mayor has, then, in its reply of 17 us in this newspaper, a good working relationship with the urban planning department of the Lazio Region. As far as I know has been repeatedly invoked to account for its casual discussions on the subject, other than a "limatina" of airspace.
Finally, the mayor has any illusions that his conduct has been promoted since the last election from the consent of citizens. He declares.
should thank the winds of history blowing in his sailing instead. In fact a clear difference in votes taken by Marino PDL between the first and second round of elections, the result has done much enraged the Roman leaders. Rather, it is good at keeping everything together, however, and despite a majority which is also torn by deep internal strife. Rather it must be acknowledged that the campaign is good at buying season after season, but nobody would bet by the end of the season, once they have exhausted the "concessions." Of course it is worrying to see the amount of Veronal (barbiturate by a powerful hypnotic power, nda) given in the municipal council and the country. It will be the resignation of the public, will be the political difficulties of others, will be the "availability" of certain directors of the minority, but a real opposition this mayor does not have it. And even if someone yells, as the director Julie Iozzo, we can say that they were two years of bad policy? It should be happy. At least he can demonstrate that there is someone outside the choir.
I insert in the controversy between the director Julie Iozzo, a member of a civic list of which he was a candidate for mayor in 2006, Mayor Marino able to stick and carrot. Many carrots, sticks as well. It is clear that mine is not a defense motion Councillor Julie Iozzo, who knows defend itself.
First I was shocked by the disproportionate reaction Palozzi statements contained after all a city councilor in opposition.
Then I want to re-establish a principle: that of truth and verisimilitude, which is accustomed to our first citizen.
I also want to reaffirm the right of criticism, which is totally unknown to our infallible Palozzi. In summary, the critical
Iozzi the mayor in an interview with Time, 16 June, where the contest is mainly two things: disaster planning that is under everyone's eyes and a bad political relationship with the minority. Much more than "sketches of poison," as Palozzi barks. The Iozzi should reproach that has been made happy and songs, when more than a year ago and proposed that it be voted favorably on a city council committee of the joint study between majority and minority to deal with urban issues. Commission, which has remained a dead letter. She should remind him that many times in the City Council was requested by Iozzo and myself a list of documents must, deposited in the technical office of the City, containing areas granted to the public in decades to be trampled by the manufacturers at the expense citizens. For thrice was asked and was denied. And today we learn that one of these acts is precisely the obligation of the person of the mayor.
what about the alleged collaboration he generously offered to the opposition, the policy of the outstretched hand of "good volume status" for the good of the country? If someone at the beginning believed in good faith in its sincerity, can now fairly claim that he was ill of his repeated falsehood. Yet according to our leaders at least you do not even have the right to say it. It is true that
Palozzi launched its offer of cooperation in the municipal council, particularly every time you are in difficulty over issues "heavy", but then is how the hell they want. And if this is a correct relationship with the minority councilors, tell you readers and voters! The mayor if he can buy who does not know, according to a well-known proverb.
addition to this song collaboration, for some 'time the mayor has been saying another refrain: what is not its the fault of the disaster planning, which is leading our region and our city centers. If the plan did not like to have adopted a variant of protection, he could and could still adopt implementation plans, could avoid presenting special variants such as Bricocolo valley, could reject the "fake" territorial pacts (as I did) instead that the Board approves a majority of shots and then was forced to withdraw the next time, because exaggerated. Rather than asking the manufacturers, which have argued, to leave something to nationals! The mayor has, then, in its reply of 17 us in this newspaper, a good working relationship with the urban planning department of the Lazio Region. As far as I know has been repeatedly invoked to account for its casual discussions on the subject, other than a "limatina" of airspace.
Finally, the mayor has any illusions that his conduct has been promoted since the last election from the consent of citizens. He declares.
should thank the winds of history blowing in his sailing instead. In fact a clear difference in votes taken by Marino PDL between the first and second round of elections, the result has done much enraged the Roman leaders. Rather, it is good at keeping everything together, however, and despite a majority which is also torn by deep internal strife. Rather it must be acknowledged that the campaign is good at buying season after season, but nobody would bet by the end of the season, once they have exhausted the "concessions." Of course it is worrying to see the amount of Veronal (barbiturate by a powerful hypnotic power, nda) given in the municipal council and the country. It will be the resignation of the public, will be the political difficulties of others, will be the "availability" of certain directors of the minority, but a real opposition this mayor does not have it. And even if someone yells, as the director Julie Iozzo, we can say that they were two years of bad policy? It should be happy. At least he can demonstrate that there is someone outside the choir.
0 comments:
Post a Comment